How Do Transformers Learn to Represent Symmetries?
Training Transformer-based architectures with finite data augmentation has become an increasingly popular approach in geometric machine learning.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- In this paper, we study the ability of a vanilla Transformer to learn various symmetries through finite data augmentation for point cloud datasets.
- We identify an ordering of increasing learnability across the following symmetry groups: (i) non-angle-preserving symmetries, (ii) angle-preserving symmetries, and (iii) base angle-preserving subgroups, such as translation, rotation, and scale.
- For the base angle-preserving groups, we further investigate the Transformer's extrapolation behavior and conduct a structural analysis of the trained models, allowing us to identify interpretable mechanisms that induce invariance.
- Finally, we extend our analysis to equivariant functions and show that the detected mechanisms for approximate invariance can also provide a key building block for learned equivariance.
Sources (1)
- [1]How Do Transformers Learn to Represent Symmetries?arXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 7, 04:01 PM
Training Transformer-based architectures with finite data augmentation has become an increasingly popular approach in geometric machine learning.
In this paper, we study the ability of a vanilla Transformer to learn various symmetries through finite data augmentation for point cloud datasets.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 7, 2026Iris-3B: Going Beyond the Latent with Pixel-Space Diffusion Training, Conversion and Fine-Tuning
- Oct 6, 2026EmbeddingGemma 2: an open, lightweight multimodal embedding model
- Oct 5, 2026LiquidAI/d1-omni-600M
- Oct 5, 2026MC-Sparse: Deconstructing and Closing the Dense-Sparse Attention Gap in Diffusion Transformers
- Sep 30, 2026Cloudflare/clef-flash
- Sep 29, 2026microsoft/AesCode-32B