Writing for the Reviewer: Defensive Writing in GPT Models
Defensive writing grows with GPT version.
Key points
- Researchers increasingly use ChatGPT to revise their papers, and recent GPT versions often narrow or even retract the authors' claims.
- We call such changes defensive writing when the given material does not support them, and we test two explanations: the model corrects the authors' overclaiming, or it writes for an anticipated reviewer.
- We ask GPT versions and models from other developers to rewrite paragraphs from papers written before ChatGPT, or to write from an evidence sheet that lists a paper's method and results.
- Combining AI writing with AI review may amplify this style.
Sources (1)
- [1]Writing for the Reviewer: Defensive Writing in GPT ModelsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 8, 06:47 AM
Defensive writing grows with GPT version.
Researchers increasingly use ChatGPT to revise their papers, and recent GPT versions often narrow or even retract the authors' claims.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.