Constructing Structured Decision Sources for Consensus-Based Pseudo-Label Learning
Consensus can make pseudo-label learning more reliable, but only when its predictors contribute genuinely different evidence.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- We address this problem by con structing decision sources through controlled changes to within-class structure.
- Starting from a shared graph representation, we vary center granularity and neighborhood mixing, reproduce each resulting source to test its stability, and select a complementary subset using node pair coassignment.
- On the public fixed splits of Cora, CiteSeer, and PubMed, evaluated with five random seeds, the constructed sources improve fixed-budget training pseudo-label precision by 1.19 to 4.39 percentage points over three conventionally initialized GCN sources.
- These results identify source construction rather than model count alone as an important design problem for consensus-based pseudo-label learning.
Sources (1)
- [1]Constructing Structured Decision Sources for Consensus-Based Pseudo-Label LearningarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 8, 10:00 AM
Consensus can make pseudo-label learning more reliable, but only when its predictors contribute genuinely different evidence.
We address this problem by con structing decision sources through controlled changes to within-class structure.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.