Has machine learning research gotten more "wordy"? [D]
I feel like I am unable to digest most machine learning research these days.
Key points
- The primary reason is because I feel like they have gotten tremendously wordy.
- Also because the papers seem to have gotten wordy, it is possible to come across some undefined (suspected) new terminology due to word usage.
- The authors mixes colloquial conversational structure into a scientific publication "a lot of ...", "we don't feel....", "it feels like...".
- At the same time, I feel mathematical explanation are becoming rarer in some research areas.
Sources (1)
- [1]Has machine learning research gotten more "wordy"? [D]r/MachineLearning (top, daily) · Oct 11, 12:39 AM
I feel like I am unable to digest most machine learning research these days.
The primary reason is because I feel like they have gotten tremendously wordy.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 10, 2026Why AlphaFold Didn't Solve Protein Folding — Pushmeet Kohli, Google DeepMind & Sal Candido, Biohub
- Oct 9, 2026Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1-Turbo
- Oct 9, 2026Introducing Clef-omni with full multimodality, plus a faster Clef and a cheaper Clef-flash
- Oct 8, 2026LEGO: A Lifting-Free Approach for Exocentric-to-Egocentric Video Generation
- Oct 8, 2026One Block, Multiple Depths: Recurrent Vision Transformers with Depth-Programmed Experts
- Oct 8, 2026Scaling to Tens of Thousands of Test-Time Iterations with Loop-Native Attention Residuals
