How Much Computation Does Every Forecast Need? Structured Block Skipping in Two Time-Series Foundation Models
We test whether whole Transformer blocks can be removed at inference time in two pretrained models: Chronos-Bolt and TimesFM 2.5.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Time-series foundation models use the same network depth for every input, although forecasting windows differ in structure and difficulty.
- At moderate sparsity, Chronos-Bolt with 7/11 candidate blocks and TimesFM with 16/20 blocks show little change in mean relative forecasting quality across datasets while reducing median A100 batch-1 latency by 11.2% and 13.4%.
- More aggressive TimesFM skipping accelerates inference further but substantially harms Traffic and Weather.
- These results establish cross-architecture structured redundancy and input-dependent opportunity, but not a deployable dynamic inference method.
Sources (1)
- [1]How Much Computation Does Every Forecast Need? Structured Block Skipping in Two Time-Series Foundation ModelsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 9, 08:26 AM
We test whether whole Transformer blocks can be removed at inference time in two pretrained models: Chronos-Bolt and TimesFM 2.5.
Time-series foundation models use the same network depth for every input, although forecasting windows differ in structure and difficulty.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 9, 2026Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1-Turbo
- Oct 9, 2026Introducing Clef-omni with full multimodality, plus a faster Clef and a cheaper Clef-flash
- Oct 9, 2026Learning Representations to Guide Pixel Diffusion Transformers
- Oct 8, 2026LEGO: A Lifting-Free Approach for Exocentric-to-Egocentric Video Generation
- Oct 8, 2026SparseDecoding: Decoding-Aware Pruning for Accurate and Efficient LLM Inference
- Oct 8, 2026One Block, Multiple Depths: Recurrent Vision Transformers with Depth-Programmed Experts