Improving Semantic Coverage in AI Test & Evaluation through Generative Augmentation
We propose a three-stage generative AI pipeline to detect and fill such semantic gaps without requiring ground-truth labels of these semantics.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- In test and evaluation (T&E) of AI models, evaluators typically have access only to a held-out test dataset and no knowledge of the training data or its semantic composition.
- First, vision-language models (VLMs) perform zero-shot binary labeling of semantic factors, and an embedding-space clustering step identifies which semantics most affect downstream model behavior.
- Second, diffusion-based image-to-image models transform existing covered images into the underrepresented semantic domain, preserving scene content while augmenting high-level appearance.
- We validate the full pipeline on both image classification and object detection under day/night semantic gaps, showing that the augmented test datasets better distinguish models with and without exposure to the missing semantic, thereby yielding T&E conclusions that more closely match those of an ideal, fully covered dataset.
Sources (1)
- [1]Improving Semantic Coverage in AI Test & Evaluation through Generative AugmentationarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 9, 02:57 PM
We propose a three-stage generative AI pipeline to detect and fill such semantic gaps without requiring ground-truth labels of these semantics.
In test and evaluation (T&E) of AI models, evaluators typically have access only to a held-out test dataset and no knowledge of the training data or its semantic composition.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 9, 2026Work2Skill: Capturing Human GUI Experience for Reusable Agent Skill Induction
- Oct 8, 2026StereoEngine: Scaling Stereo Bimanual Robot Data without Stereo Cameras
- Oct 8, 2026openai/codex rust-v0.162.0: 0.162.0
- Oct 8, 2026Microsoft Joins the Local AI Push
- Oct 8, 2026Understanding Jev, the new model everyone is talking about
- Oct 7, 2026[AINews] Claude Haiku 5.5 — better than GPT-6 Luna at the same pricing