Evidence Before Sampling: Interpretable Implicit Negative Candidate Discovery for Recommendation
Recommender systems learn from observed user-item interactions, but explicit negative feedback is often unavailable.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Since deep learning models require negative signals for training, negative sampling methods typically treat selected unobserved interactions as negatives.
- We formulate implicit negative candidate discovery to identify unobserved interactions supported by observed customer behavior.
- Our results show that negative candidate validity can be evaluated separately from downstream recommendation performance.
- This distinction enables evidence-based, business-aligned, and explainable negative selection, improving both interpretability and model training in sparse, skewed, real-world recommendation settings.
Sources (1)
- [1]Evidence Before Sampling: Interpretable Implicit Negative Candidate Discovery for RecommendationarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 6, 04:02 AM
Recommender systems learn from observed user-item interactions, but explicit negative feedback is often unavailable.
Since deep learning models require negative signals for training, negative sampling methods typically treat selected unobserved interactions as negatives.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.