TabReliBench: Evaluating Tabular Foundation Models Beyond Predictive Accuracy
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) are increasingly popular for their strong predictive performance.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- We assess reliability through point prediction, distributional quality, marginal and subgroup calibration, and interval efficiency.
- We then introduce TabReliBench, a large classification and regression benchmark for these comparisons and dataset-level analyses.
- We find that TFMs' rankings change between TabArena and our benchmark and across reliability metrics.
- Ensembling improves predictive performance but does not consistently improve calibration of PPDs; TFMs also benefit little from conformal post-processing, which does not reliably resolve subgroup gaps.
Sources (1)
- [1]TabReliBench: Evaluating Tabular Foundation Models Beyond Predictive AccuracyarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 9, 02:29 PM
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) are increasingly popular for their strong predictive performance.
We assess reliability through point prediction, distributional quality, marginal and subgroup calibration, and interval efficiency.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 9, 2026New Math from OpenAI
- Oct 9, 2026Work2Skill: Capturing Human GUI Experience for Reusable Agent Skill Induction
- Oct 8, 2026openai/codex rust-v0.162.0: 0.162.0
- Oct 8, 2026Microsoft Joins the Local AI Push
- Oct 8, 2026Understanding Jev, the new model everyone is talking about
- Oct 7, 2026[AINews] Claude Haiku 5.5 — better than GPT-6 Luna at the same pricing